auto-copilot-code-cleanliness-review.yml

name: "Periodic Code Cleanliness Review"
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json

uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
on:
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
  schedule:
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
    # Run every 12 hours (at 00:00 and 12:00 UTC)
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
    - cron: '0 0,12 * * *'
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
  workflow_dispatch:  # Allow manual trigger
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json

uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
permissions:
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
  contents: write
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
  pull-requests: write
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
  issues: write
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json

uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
jobs:
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
  code-cleanliness-review:
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
    runs-on: self-hosted
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
    steps:
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
      - name: Checkout code
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
        uses: actions/checkout@main
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
        with:
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
          fetch-depth: 0  # Full history for better analysis
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json

uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
      - name: Analyze Large Files
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
        id: analyze
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
        run: |
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
          echo "## Large Files Analysis" > /tmp/analysis.md
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
          echo "" >> /tmp/analysis.md
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
          echo "Files larger than 500 lines that may benefit from splitting:" >> /tmp/analysis.md
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
          echo "" >> /tmp/analysis.md
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
          
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
          # Find files larger than 500 lines (excluding common large files)
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
          find . -type f \( -name "*.py" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.java" -o -name "*.go" -o -name "*.cs" -o -name "*.rb" \) \
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            ! -path "*/node_modules/*" \
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            ! -path "*/dist/*" \
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            ! -path "*/build/*" \
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            ! -path "*/.venv/*" \
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            ! -path "*/vendor/*" \
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            -exec wc -l {} \; | \
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            awk '$1 > 500 {print $1 " lines: " $2}' | \
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            sort -rn >> /tmp/analysis.md || echo "No large files found" >> /tmp/analysis.md
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
          
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
          echo "" >> /tmp/analysis.md
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
          echo "## Code Complexity Analysis" >> /tmp/analysis.md
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
          echo "" >> /tmp/analysis.md
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
          echo "Files with potential complexity issues:" >> /tmp/analysis.md
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
          
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
          # Find files with many functions/classes (basic heuristic)
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
          for ext in py js ts java go cs rb; do
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            if [ "$ext" = "py" ]; then
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              pattern="^def |^class "
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            elif [ "$ext" = "js" ] || [ "$ext" = "ts" ]; then
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              pattern="^function |^class |const.*=.*=>|function.*{$"
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            else
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              pattern="^class |^def |^func "
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            fi
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            find . -type f -name "*.$ext" \
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              ! -path "*/node_modules/*" \
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              ! -path "*/dist/*" \
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              ! -path "*/build/*" \
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              ! -path "*/.venv/*" \
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              ! -path "*/vendor/*" \
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              -exec sh -c 'count=$(grep -c "$1" "$2" 2>/dev/null || echo 0); if [ "$count" -gt 20 ]; then echo "$count definitions in $2"; fi' _ "$pattern" {} \; \
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              2>/dev/null || true
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
          done | sort -rn >> /tmp/analysis.md
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
          
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
          cat /tmp/analysis.md
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json

uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
      - name: GitHub Copilot Code Review
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
        uses: github/copilot-cli-action@main
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
        with:
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
          query: |
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            Review the codebase for code cleanliness issues:
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            1. Identify files that are too large (>500 lines) and suggest how to split them into smaller, focused modules
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            2. Look for code duplication and suggest refactoring opportunities
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            3. Check for consistent code style and formatting
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            4. Identify complex functions that could be simplified
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            5. Suggest improvements for code organization and structure
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            6. Check for proper separation of concerns
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            Provide actionable recommendations with specific file names and line numbers.
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
        env:
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
          GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
        continue-on-error: true
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json

uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
      - name: Create Issue for Code Cleanliness Review
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
        uses: actions/github-script@main
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
        with:
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
          github-token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
          script: |
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            const fs = require('fs');
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            const analysis = fs.readFileSync('/tmp/analysis.md', 'utf8');
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            const date = new Date().toISOString().split('T')[0];
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            const title = `Code Cleanliness Review - ${date}`;
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            const body = `# Periodic Code Cleanliness Review
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            This is an automated review conducted every 12 hours to maintain code quality.
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            ${analysis}
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            ## Recommendations
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            Please review the analysis above and:
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            1. Split large files (>500 lines) into smaller, focused modules
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            2. Refactor complex functions into smaller, testable units
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            3. Remove code duplication
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            4. Ensure consistent code style
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            5. Improve code organization and structure
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            ## Next Steps
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            - Assign this issue to relevant team members
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            - Create follow-up PRs to address findings
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            - Document any architectural decisions
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            ---
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            *This issue was automatically generated by the Code Cleanliness Review workflow.*
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            `;
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            // Check if similar issue exists (open, created in last 24 hours)
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            const issues = await github.rest.issues.listForRepo({
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              owner: context.repo.owner,
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              repo: context.repo.repo,
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              state: 'open',
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              labels: ['code-cleanliness', 'automated'],
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              per_page: 10
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            });
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            const recentIssue = issues.data.find(issue => {
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              const createdAt = new Date(issue.created_at);
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              const hoursSinceCreation = (Date.now() - createdAt) / (1000 * 60 * 60);
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              return hoursSinceCreation < 24;
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            });
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            if (recentIssue) {
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              console.log(`Recent issue found: #${recentIssue.number}, skipping creation`);
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              // Update existing issue with new analysis
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              await github.rest.issues.createComment({
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
                owner: context.repo.owner,
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
                repo: context.repo.repo,
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
                issue_number: recentIssue.number,
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
                body: `## Updated Analysis (${date})\n\n${analysis}`
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              });
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            } else {
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              // Create new issue
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              await github.rest.issues.create({
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
                owner: context.repo.owner,
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
                repo: context.repo.repo,
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
                title: title,
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
                body: body,
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
                labels: ['code-cleanliness', 'automated', 'needs-review']
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
              });
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json
            }
uto-amazonq-review.properties.json