Commit 0822a56
committed
rust: support the
Now it is possible to have tests that use the `?` operator:
/// ```
/// # use kernel::{spawn_work_item, workqueue};
/// spawn_work_item!(workqueue::system(), || pr_info!("x"))?;
/// # Ok::<(), Error>(())
/// ```
The logic is also simplified: instead of extracting the source
code and the originally-crate-level attributes separately,
wrap everything into an extra scope. This allows to reuse
the `rustdoc`-generated `unwrap()` and `Result` type.
This could break if `rustdoc` happens to emit an attribute that
can only be used at the crate-level, like a `feature(...)` one,
but the previous approach could also break in other ways.
There is a workaround for `Result` not being qualified in
the `rustdoc`-generated code -- it picks up our own `Result`,
and with the simplified logic here we cannot easily move our
`use` of the prelude inside the source code.
Suggested-by: Andreas Hindborg <andreas.hindborg@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>? operator in doctests1 parent dbb685d commit 0822a56
2 files changed
Lines changed: 23 additions & 41 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
13 | 13 | | |
14 | 14 | | |
15 | 15 | | |
16 | | - | |
17 | | - | |
18 | | - | |
19 | | - | |
20 | | - | |
21 | | - | |
22 | | - | |
| 16 | + | |
23 | 17 | | |
24 | 18 | | |
25 | | - | |
26 | | - | |
27 | | - | |
28 | | - | |
29 | | - | |
30 | | - | |
31 | | - | |
32 | | - | |
33 | | - | |
34 | | - | |
35 | | - | |
36 | | - | |
37 | | - | |
38 | | - | |
39 | | - | |
40 | | - | |
41 | | - | |
42 | | - | |
43 | | - | |
44 | | - | |
45 | | - | |
46 | | - | |
47 | | - | |
48 | | - | |
49 | | - | |
| 19 | + | |
| 20 | + | |
| 21 | + | |
| 22 | + | |
| 23 | + | |
| 24 | + | |
| 25 | + | |
| 26 | + | |
| 27 | + | |
| 28 | + | |
| 29 | + | |
| 30 | + | |
| 31 | + | |
| 32 | + | |
| 33 | + | |
50 | 34 | | |
51 | 35 | | |
52 | 36 | | |
53 | 37 | | |
54 | | - | |
55 | 38 | | |
56 | 39 | | |
57 | 40 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
29 | 29 | | |
30 | 30 | | |
31 | 31 | | |
| 32 | + | |
32 | 33 | | |
33 | 34 | | |
34 | 35 | | |
| |||
39 | 40 | | |
40 | 41 | | |
41 | 42 | | |
| 43 | + | |
42 | 44 | | |
43 | 45 | | |
44 | 46 | | |
| |||
50 | 52 | | |
51 | 53 | | |
52 | 54 | | |
| 55 | + | |
53 | 56 | | |
54 | 57 | | |
55 | | - | |
| 58 | + | |
| 59 | + | |
| 60 | + | |
| 61 | + | |
56 | 62 | | |
57 | 63 | | |
58 | 64 | | |
| |||
93 | 99 | | |
94 | 100 | | |
95 | 101 | | |
96 | | - | |
97 | | - | |
98 | 102 | | |
99 | 103 | | |
100 | 104 | | |
| |||
127 | 131 | | |
128 | 132 | | |
129 | 133 | | |
130 | | - | |
131 | 134 | | |
132 | 135 | | |
133 | 136 | | |
134 | 137 | | |
135 | 138 | | |
136 | 139 | | |
137 | | - | |
138 | | - | |
139 | 140 | | |
140 | 141 | | |
141 | 142 | | |
| |||
146 | 147 | | |
147 | 148 | | |
148 | 149 | | |
149 | | - | |
150 | 150 | | |
151 | 151 | | |
152 | 152 | | |
153 | | - | |
154 | 153 | | |
155 | 154 | | |
156 | 155 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments