Finished 01 and 02

Signed-off-by: Nick Papior <nickpapior@gmail.com>

Author: zerothi

presentations/01/device.tex

@@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ \subsection{NEGF Algorithm in TBtrans}
   \end{itemize}
 
   \incg[]{tbt-algorithm}
-  
+
+  \doicite{Papior \etal: \doi{10.1016/j.cpc.2016.09.022}}
+
 \end{frame}
 

presentations/01/electrodes.tex

@@ -542,7 +542,9 @@ \subsection{Electrodes}
         \end{tikzpicture}
     }
   \end{center}
-  
+
+  \doicite{Papior \& Brandbyge: \doi{10.11581/DTU:00000025}}
+
 \end{frame}
 
 %%% Local Variables:

presentations/01/green.tex

@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ \subsection{Rules of integration}
   \begin{block}<3->{Difference between diagonalisation and Green function methods}
 
     \begin{columns}[t]
-      \column{.5\linewidth}
+      \column{.4\linewidth}
 
       \begin{center}
         Diagonalization
@@ -151,15 +151,15 @@ \subsection{Rules of integration}
 
       $k$-points, all energy-eigenvalues
 
-      \column{.5\linewidth}
+      \column{.4\linewidth}
 
       \begin{center}
         Green functions
 
         \Large 2D-sampling
       \end{center}
 
-      $k$-point and $E$-points are both required to be sampled
+      $k$ and $E$-points are both required to be sampled
 
     \end{columns}
 

presentations/01/options.tex

@@ -18,14 +18,13 @@ \subsection{fdf input}
     \emph{easy} input file:
 \begin{verbatim}
 TBT.DOS.Gf true
-TBT.DOS.A false
 TBT.ElectronicTemperature 25. meV
 %block TBT.k
 ...
 %endblock
 \end{verbatim}
 
-    \item First encountered option is used (below $25\,\mathrm{meV}$ will be used)
+    \item First encountered option is used ($25\,\mathrm{meV}$ will be used)
 \begin{verbatim}
 TBT.ElectronicTemperature 25. meV
 TBT.ElectronicTemperature 50. meV
@@ -57,6 +56,6 @@ \subsection{fdf input}
     \end{tabular}
 
   \end{block}
-  
+  \vskip 1em
 \end{frame}
 

presentations/01/se.tex

@@ -18,19 +18,18 @@ \subsection{The concept}
       \begin{equation*}
         \HH' = \HH + \SE
       \end{equation*}
-      \item A wide variety of physical properties
+      \item May describe wide variety of physical properties
       \begin{itemize}[<.->]
         \item Semi-infinity
         \item Local defects
         \item Absorbing potentials
         \item \dots
       \end{itemize}
-      \item In TranSiesta the self-energies are \emph{only} semi-infinite leads
-    \end{itemize}
+      \item TranSiesta, self-energies are \emph{only} semi-infinite leads
 
-    \uncover<.->{
-        Remember(!) that TBtrans allows custom (additional) self-energies, even for DFT calculations!
-    }
+      \item ! TBtrans allows custom (additional) self-energies, \emph{even} when calculating
+      transport from DFT Hamiltonians
+    \end{itemize}
 
   \end{block}
 

presentations/02/reiterate.tex

@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ \subsection{Reiterate self-energy requirements}
 
     \begin{itemize}
       \item<+-> Remember that $\SE_{-/+}$ is a correction to the Hamiltonian (i.e. 
-      $\HH = \HH + \SE$)
+      $\HH' = \HH + \SE$)
 
       \item \emph{Extremely} important in TranSiesta, electrostatics are long-range!
     \end{itemize}

presentations/03/algorithms.tex

@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ \subsection{The omnipotent pivoting scheme?}
   \end{center}
 
   \begin{itemize}[<+->]
-    \item Analysing all build-in pivoting schemes
+    \item Analysing (nearly) all build-in pivoting schemes
 
     \item Extremely fast
 

presentations/03/hartree.tex

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ \subsection{Boundary conditions}
     equation via Fourier transforms, i.e. periodic)
 
     \item Always remember that the self-energy \emph{forces} the boundary conditions,
-    i.e. long range potential decay may be forced too short
+    i.e. a long range decay-potential may be forced too short
 
   \end{itemize}
 
@@ -76,11 +76,11 @@ \subsection{Boundary conditions}
     The electrode Hartree potential are the boundary conditions.
 
     In TranSiesta this is accomplished by fixing the electrostatic potential at one of the
-    electrode planes (the one farthest from the device region).
+    electrode planes (the plane farthest from the device region).
 
     \begin{itemize}
       \item For $N_\idxE=2$ and aligned semi-infinite directions the potential profile can
-      easily be approximated by a linear ramp.
+      easily be approximated by a linear ramp $V(x) = ax+b$.
 
       \item For un-aligned semi-infinite directions (or $N_\idxE\neq2$) the potential
       profile cannot easily be approximated.
@@ -92,8 +92,9 @@ \subsection{Boundary conditions}
 
         \item A much better approach is to provide an \emph{external} potential profile
         guess, i.e. solve the boundary conditions using external Poisson
-        solvers\footnote{This may seem like a more daunting task than it is. The guess is
-            the Poisson solution \emph{without} charges, only the boundary conditions.}
+        solvers\footnote{\uncover<4->{This may seem like a more daunting task than it
+                is. The guess is the Poisson solution \emph{without} charges, only the
+                boundary conditions.}}
 
       \end{itemize}
     \end{itemize}

presentations/03/talk.tex

@@ -24,6 +24,5 @@
 
 \input hartree.tex
 \input algorithms.tex
-\input pivoting.tex
 
 \end{document}