Skip to content

[WIP] Assessing responsibilities of the library for downstream I/O#38

Merged
hyp3ri0n-ng merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
copilot/discuss-more-responsibility
Nov 11, 2025
Merged

[WIP] Assessing responsibilities of the library for downstream I/O#38
hyp3ri0n-ng merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
copilot/discuss-more-responsibility

Conversation

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Nov 11, 2025

Thanks for assigning this issue to me. I'm starting to work on it and will keep this PR's description up to date as I form a plan and make progress.

Original prompt

This section details on the original issue you should resolve

<issue_title>Should this be more of a sans-io project?</issue_title>
<issue_description>This library intentionally doesn't do any I/O. It expects downstream libraries to add the I/O. But this isn't really a "Sans-IO" project in the sense that there are still aspects of the protocol that are ignored, such as the JSON RPC framing (especially multiplexing commands and handling errors). Should this project absorb some more responsibility to simplify downstream implementations?</issue_description>

Comments on the Issue (you are @copilot in this section)


💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

@hyp3ri0n-ng hyp3ri0n-ng merged commit b96ac8c into master Nov 11, 2025
8 of 15 checks passed
Copilot AI requested a review from hyp3ri0n-ng November 11, 2025 03:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Should this be more of a sans-io project?

2 participants