Document JsonApiEndpoints enum#1301
Document JsonApiEndpoints enum#1301verdie-g wants to merge 9 commits intojson-api-dotnet:masterfrom verdie-g:document-json-api-endpoints-enum
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1301 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 93.03% 93.03%
=======================================
Files 268 268
Lines 8795 8795
=======================================
Hits 8182 8182
Misses 613 613 |
|
Thanks. I'll get back to this next month, after my break. |
bkoelman
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please note the line at the top of this file:
// IMPORTANT: An internal copy of this type exists in the SourceGenerators project. Keep these in sync when making changes.
These changes should be replicated in the other file.
|
The CI error is weird, I did run cleanupcode 🤔 |
Strange indeed. Running locally on Windows does not produce a diff. I haven't seen this happen before, will investigate. What OS are you using? |
|
Windows 11 and |
|
Could it be a line-ending thing? Maybe locally I'm using CRLF and the CI is using LF the number of characters on the line is different? |
Yes, but I don't think that should matter. It has always worked that way. I've created a temporary PR #1304 to investigate. |
|
@verdie-g Sorry this is taking so long. I've opened a bug at https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/RSRP-494002, but it hasn't been triaged yet. Meanwhile, can you please merge or rebase on the latest changes in master? I've replaced AppVeyor with GitHub Actions. This is a nice opportunity to test whether everything works from a community PR. I can't do it myself because my account has write permissions and I'd like to confirm builds work without that. Sadly, it won't fix the cleanupcode bug though. |
|
Looks like it's failing for macos |
Yes, same as linux. |
|
@verdie-g I'd like to keep this PR open. I suspect this was closed unintentionally as a side effect of deleting your fork. I'm unable to reopen because your fork no longer exists. Can you restore it? We still want to take this PR. The related issue has been triaged with priority critical, so I have high hopes a fix will become available soon. |
|
I completely forgot about that PR. I'll try restoring the fork when I get some time. |
|
Superseded by #1423. |
Closes #1298
QUALITY CHECKLIST