Skip to content

docs: fix wording in Sorbet example comment#265

Open
Rohan5commit wants to merge 1 commit intoopenai:mainfrom
Rohan5commit:docs/demo-sorbet-in-fact-comment-20260423
Open

docs: fix wording in Sorbet example comment#265
Rohan5commit wants to merge 1 commit intoopenai:mainfrom
Rohan5commit:docs/demo-sorbet-in-fact-comment-20260423

Conversation

@Rohan5commit
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • fix infact in the Sorbet example comment

Related issue

  • N/A (trivial example-comment fix)

Guideline alignment

Validation

  • git diff --check

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 23, 2026 03:01
@Rohan5commit Rohan5commit requested a review from a team as a code owner April 23, 2026 03:01
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread examples/demo_sorbet.rb
# you will see a red squiggly line on `params` due to a quirk of the sorbet type system.
#
# this file will still infact, run correctly as uncommented.
# this file will still in fact, run correctly as uncommented.
Copy link

Copilot AI Apr 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The punctuation here reads awkwardly/incorrectly: "still in fact, run". Consider either removing the comma ("still in fact run") or moving it to the standard parenthetical form ("still, in fact, run"), and "when uncommented" reads clearer than "as uncommented".

Suggested change
# this file will still in fact, run correctly as uncommented.
# this file will still, in fact, run correctly when uncommented.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants